Winning schools and universities one district at a time can take an owner ten or twenty years, and the customer base that results renews slowly and loyally. Consolidators often call long before the owner planned to sell, with a figure already in mind, but what the company fetches depends on how many credible buyers compete for it: more than 500 different buyers have acquired EdTech software companies since 2015. Below is the deal record for EdTech software: the multiples, which customers carry the higher ones, and who is buying.
The companies covered sell their own software to schools, colleges, universities, education authorities, childcare providers and individual learners:
- Student information and school management systems
- School finance, HR, timetabling, transport, safety and parent communication tools
- Learning platforms and virtual classrooms
- Assessment, proctoring and plagiarism software
- Adaptive learning and interactive curriculum platforms
- Admissions, careers and student success software for universities
- Learning apps
Schools and online schools, tutoring companies, course and training-content providers, educational publishers and IT services to schools sit outside the figures; safety training providers have their own page on safety training company valuation. Learning software for employers’ HR teams counts as HR software, clinical training as healthcare software and security awareness training as cybersecurity software. Software for public school districts is counted here, and software for other public bodies with government software.
We count 921 acquisitions of privately held EdTech software companies from 2015 to 2025, 490 of them since 2021, within our wider mnożniki wyceny software research. Terms are rarely disclosed in this market: 3.0% of the deals carry a revenue multiple and 0.7% an EBITDA multiple.
EdTech Software Valuation Multiples Compared With All Software
Enterprise value (EV) is equity value plus net debt. EV/Revenue divides it by the target’s revenue, EV/EBITDA by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, which buyers adjust for one-off items and owner costs.
| EdTech software | All software (Aventis database) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mediana EV/Przychody | 4.51x (28 deals) | 3.38x (1,021 deals) |
| EV/Revenue, middle half of deals | 3.25x to 6.67x | 2.04x to 5.94x |
| Median EV/Revenue excluding flagged deals | 3.88x (18 deals) | n/a |
| Mediana EV/EBITDA | 13.2x (6 deals) | 13.8x (376 deals) |
| Mediana wielkości transakcji | $17.9M (163 deals) | $23.0M (6,185 deals) |
EdTech software sells above software as a whole on revenue, on smaller deals. Part of that lead comes from ten deals we flag for unusual features, such as partial stakes or a mix of software and content: leaving them out gives 3.88x, still above the software figure. The EBITDA median rests on six deals and agrees with the revenue median only for a company with an EBITDA margin of about a third, so revenue is the multiple to work from and EBITDA a check on it.
EdTech Software Valuation by Customer: Schools or Universities
We sorted the 28 deals with a published revenue multiple by who the customer is.
| Main customer | Mediana EV/Przychody | EV/Revenue, middle half | Median excluding flagged deals |
|---|---|---|---|
| K-12 schools | 3.63x (13 deals) | 3.28x to 4.93x | 3.61x (11 deals) |
| Higher education and post-school training | 5.05x (10 deals) | 3.48x to 6.49x | 6.43x (7 deals) |
Software for universities and other post-school providers sold above software for K-12 schools, and the gap widens once flagged deals are left out. The K-12 figure is the tighter of the two, whatever the product: school information systems, finance software, safety products and learning platforms all sit in a narrow band. Twelve of its thirteen deals are of companies outside the United States. At the top of the higher-education group are small university products, such as timetabling and careers platforms, bought by larger software groups.
EdTech Software Valuations by Size, Period and Country
| Przychody przejmowanej spółki | Transakcje | Mediana EV/Przychody | EV/Revenue, middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $5M | 21 | 4.67x (10 deals) | 3.53x to 8.43x |
| $5M to $20M | 24 | 5.84x (13 deals) | 1.98x to 6.69x |
| $20M to $100M | 9 | n/a (4 deals) | n/a |
| $100M and above | 1 | n/a (1 deal) | n/a |
Only 55 deals record the target’s revenue, and the two bands with enough multiples overlap almost entirely, so the record shows little link between size and multiple.
Deals announced from 2021 to 2025 sold at a median of 5.84x revenue (11 deals), against 3.77x for 2015 to 2020 (17 deals), but the later deals with a multiple are much smaller ($10.0M median deal size against $36.3M) and six of the eleven are flagged. Leaving the flagged deals out, the later median is 4.93x (5 deals) against 3.63x (13 deals).
Half the deals, 460 of 921, are of American companies, yet only four of them publish a revenue multiple, so the record leaves the US multiple open. US deals are far larger: a median deal size of $90.0M (61 deals), against $10.1M (102 deals) elsewhere, where the revenue median is 4.51x on 24 deals.
What Drives an EdTech Software Valuation
Public budgets and buying cycles. Most customers are schools, districts, universities or governments, paid from public budgets. A district that signs for a core system may stay for a decade, while supplemental tools come and go with the budget. Buyers look at renewal rates across budget cuts, the share of revenue on multi-year contracts and how much depends on one ministry, state or funding program.
Temporary funding. US schools bought a great deal of software with federal pandemic relief money, and the deadline to commit the last of it passed in September 2024. Buyers ask which customers signed with that money and whether they renewed once it was gone, and treat revenue won in those years with more caution than revenue that predates them.
Enrollment. Much EdTech software is priced per student, so revenue moves with the number of learners. Falling birth rates are reducing enrollment in many countries, and some universities are losing applicants. Buyers separate growth from new customers and price increases from growth in enrollment.
Student data. Education software holds data on children, covered by US federal and state student privacy laws, European and UK rules on children’s data and district contract terms. Large breaches at school software vendors have made security a standard diligence item, and the EU AI Act lists AI used to admit students, grade them or watch them during exams as high-risk.
Place among the platforms. Most school products connect to a student information system and a learning platform through standards such as OneRoster, Ed-Fi and LTI. Buyers of a specialist product ask whether that platform has started to build the same function.
Subscriptions, content and services. Subscription revenue for the software earns the multiple; content licenses, teacher training and service days are valued closer to their margin, so buyers ask for each stream and its gross margin. Products for individual learners face a further question on retention and the cost of each new subscriber, since study and homework-help apps lost users when free generative AI tools arrived.
How we present these to buyers. A buyer pays for what it can see and check. Part of our work in a sale is to present the business as strongly as the facts allow: we show renewals across budget cycles, the revenue that predates temporary funding, and the split between software, content and services, and we deal with weak points before a buyer finds them and uses them to lower the offer.
Who Is Buying EdTech Software Companies
Deal numbers climbed from 58 in 2015 to 141 in 2021 and have fallen each year since, to 71 in 2025. Private equity firms and their portfolio companies were behind 40% of the 921 deals, against 33% across software, and behind 52% of the 2025 deals. Half the targets were American; the UK and Ireland (13%), Asia-Pacific (12%), continental Western Europe (9%), the Nordic countries (6%), Canada (3%) and other countries (6%) make up the rest. The eleven groups with eight or more EdTech deals bought 153 of the 914 companies with a named buyer, about one in six.
| Buyer group | Headquarters | Ownership (October 2026) | EdTech software companies acquired | Other software companies acquired | Total software companies acquired |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constellation Software | Toronto | Listed (TSX) | 33 | 590 | 623 |
| PowerSchool | Folsom, California | Private equity owned (Bain Capital) | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Imagine Learning | Tempe, Arizona | Private equity owned (Silver Lake, Onex) | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Renaissance | Bloomington, Minnesota | Private equity owned (Francisco Partners, Blackstone) | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Visma | Oslo | Private equity owned (Hg-led) | 12 | 234 | 246 |
| Instructure | Salt Lake City | Private equity owned (KKR, Dragoneer) | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Roper Technologies (Frontline Education) | Sarasota, Florida | Listed (Nasdaq) | 11 | 45 | 56 |
| Juniper Education | Chelmsford, UK | Private equity owned (Horizon Capital) | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Banyan Software | Atlanta | Private, long-term owner | 9 | 81 | 90 |
| LINQ | Austin, Texas | Private equity backed (Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe; Banneker) | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| IRIS Software Group | Slough, UK | Private equity owned (Leonard Green, Hg) | 8 | 15 | 23 |
Most of the active buyers are US platforms assembling district software suites, a learning platform adding the tools around it, European groups that buy school software one country at a time, and diversified groups that buy and hold education businesses beside many other verticals. Most are owned or backed by private equity today; the 40% share above counts each deal by its buyer’s ownership at the time. Owners hearing from a buy-and-hold group can read our guide to sprzedaży firmy do software roll-upu.
On the disclosed deals, strategic buyers paid the higher revenue multiple, 6.43x (19 deals) against 3.77x (9 deals) for financial buyers, but most were small, with a median deal size of $12.7M, and seven of the 19 are flagged; setting the flagged deals aside, the medians are 4.46x (12 deals) and 3.70x (6 deals). Our note on nabywcy strategiczni a finansowi sets out how each kind tends to run a deal.
One buyer’s offer tells you what that buyer would like to pay. Offers from several buyers, made at the same time on the same information, tell you what the business is worth. That is what a sale process does, and it is the work we do for owners: porozmawiaj z nami before you reply to an approach.
Selling an EdTech Software Company: If a Buyer Has Approached You
An approach usually comes on the buyer’s timetable, on the buyer’s terms and with no rival offer to compare it against, so an owner who answers it alone is negotiating with one party. A competitive sale process changes that in four ways, and running it is what we do for owners.
Several buyers bid at the same time. Financial buyers made 44% of EdTech software acquisitions since 2021, and more than 500 different buyers have acquired companies in the segment since 2015. A US school platform and a European group entering your country value the same company differently, and offers that arrive in the same week, on the same information, show what the market will pay.
The process sets the terms of engagement. The timetable, the information each buyer sees and the date offers are due are set for the seller, so competition decides the value instead of the first buyer’s opening figure.
Every term is negotiated while alternatives exist. District contracts that need consent to a change of control, any earn-out, and how revenue that depended on temporary funding is treated: each changes what the deal is worth to you, and each moves most while a second buyer is still in the process.
The business is ready before the first call. Three years of recurring revenue by customer type, with renewals, price increases, lost customers and enrollment effects shown separately, the split between software, content and services, and student data protection, security incidents and certifications. Buyers discount what they cannot check, so we prepare this with you before any buyer is contacted.
Metodologia
The figures come from the Aventis Advisors software deal database (Mergermarket, acquirer announcements and own research).
- Acquisitions of 50% or more of privately held companies, or of business units, announced from 2015 to 2025.
- Median deal size uses enterprise value where published, otherwise the deal value.
- Medians need at least five deals and ranges at least ten.
- Few deals publish their terms, so the multiples rest on a small sample weighted toward larger deals.
- Financial buyers are private equity firms and the companies they own at the time of the deal.
- Buyer tables count each group under its current owner.
- Deals with unusual features, such as partial stakes or businesses that mix software and services, stay in the figures and are flagged in our records.
Talk to Us
If you own a EdTech software company, talk to us before you reply to an approach, agree a price or sign a letter of intent. We run competitive sale processes for owners: we prepare the business for buyers, approach the school software platforms, European education software groups and private equity firms most likely to pay for your product and customers, bring their offers to a single deadline and negotiate the terms through to closing. We advised CKSource, the company behind CKEditor, on its sale to Tiugo Technologies, backed by Providence Strategic Growth, and Symfonia, backed by Accel-KKR and MidEuropa, on its acquisition of Nefeni, so we know how software buyers and their private equity owners build their offers. Aventis Advisors is a boutique M&A firm advising on transactions with typical enterprise values between $5M and $100M. The first conversation is informal and confidential. Contact us at contact@aventis-advisors.com or see our M&A advisory for software companies.

